I Blame the Pastors
Last Update 5/24/2015

If you don't like to read and you're not a Christian anyway, I think George Carlin sums up our problems in this country pretty good in his video on youtube.com titled, "George Carlin: The American Dream" - 


I'm certainly not a Carlin fan and he's dead now, but I think he's accurate in what he says and a lot of people did listen to his analogies on society.  I care about truth, not who the speaker is so much.  Find me a Christian speaker who people will listen to and I'll use their video, because there must be one posted somewhere without all the cuss words... So someone sent me the following link and I agree that it sums up the problem:

If you really think you couldn't possibly be totally brainwashed about your government and who really runs it behind the scenes, I think this video by Eustace Mullins will prove the point: The New World Order & Federal Reserve Bank -

Former Communist Party official Manning Johnson testified in 1953 before the House Un-American Activities Committee: “Once the tactic of infiltration of religious organizations was set by the Kremlin … the Communists discovered that the destruction of religion could proceed much faster through infiltration of the Church by Communists operating within the Church itself. … it would be necessary to concentrate Communists in the seminaries. … This policy … was successful beyond … expectations.”

In the early 1950s, Mrs. Bella V. Dodd, former high-ranking official of the American Communist Party, testified before the same HUAC: “In the 1930s we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within.” and “Right now they are in the highest places in the Church.” She predicted changes so drastic that “you will not recognize the Church.”

Dr. Alice von Hildebrand: “Bella Dodd told my husband and me that when she was an active party member, she had dealt with no fewer than four cardinals within the Vatican ‘who were working for us’.” (Latin Mass Magazine, Summer 2001)

In Public Law 313 (4-14-1952), the Federal government admitted that its support of the United Nations is unconstitutional and contingent upon its continuing to operate under “emergency powers.”  It said: “Whereas the existing state of war…and the termination thereof…would render certain statutory provisions inoperative….and Whereas some of these statutory provisions are needed to insure the…capacity of the United States to support the United Nations…it is desirable to extend these statutory provisions.”  Incidentally, the enemy in this “war” is the American people; a story you will find in To Tame a Tyrant.

According to Mr. Carl Rix, former President of the American Bar Association, America’s biblically based Constitution was replaced by the United Nations Charter.  In Senate testimony on May 11, 1955, he summarized the death of our Constitution by saying:
“Congress is no longer bound by its Constitutional system of delegated power.  Its only test is under the obligatory power to promote human rights (not to be confused with the unalienable rights guaranteed by our Constitution) in these fields of endeavor: Civil, political, economic, social and cultural.  These (powers) are found in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations.  Congress may now legislate as an uninhibited body with no shackles of delegated powers under the Constitution.  Our entire system of government of delegated powers of Congress has been changed to a system of undelegated powers without amendment (of the Constitution) by the people of the United States.”



This comes from Robert Chapman, publisher of International Forecaster.


Put simply, the feds have now actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States.  They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to “take” all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.  This is an unimaginable betrayal of every man, woman and child in the USA. An outrage worthy of violent overthrow.

Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China have just CONFIRMED to me that the United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People’s Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China’s continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!

The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.  This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take inside the USA land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.

Put simply, the feds have now actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States.  They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to “take” all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.  This is an unimaginable betrayal of every man, woman and child in the USA.  An outrage worthy of violent overthrow.  I am endeavoring to obtain images or copies of the actual document but in the interim, several different sources both in the US and in China have CONFIRMED this to me.  February 24, 2011

A Brainwashed Christian:

The first thing I think we need to agree on is that you can be a Pastor, Elder, Teacher, Deacon, etc, or just attend a Church, Tabernacle, or any of those names you want to apply to your building or your group of worshippers to learn more about God's word; and participate in any way you can to further those teachings in your world, and you can be brainwashed and totally wrong about what scripture teaches in the Bible.  If you don't believe that, then you missed all those verses about false teachers in the Bible.  If you listen to false teachers, and you're convinced what they're teaching you is truth, then you're brainwashed. 

There's no two ways about it.  You can continue your whole life believing in God's word, believing you know what scripture means to whatever the extent of your learning has been, and most of what you know can be absolutely wrong.  It's wrong because your teachers had no discernment of the truth of God's word, and maybe you didn't either.

But the way to make sure you break out of any false teachings, is to appeal to God for the truth.  GOD IS TRUTH, but it still depends on the desires of your heart whether he enlightens you to any of his word or not.  We can argue about God's word till the cows come home, but unless GOD HIMSELF gives you discernment, all we'll be doing is disagreeing on what God's word actually says.  You must have a desire for truth, regardless of what the truth happens to be.  If the truth convicts you of sin, then so be it.  If you don't particularly want other people to know a specific truth about yourself, and the truth comes out, you need to admit it, face it, and repent from it.

If it's easier to cover it up because it would create too much embarrassment, what do you do?  Why should God give you discernment, if truth is not of primary importance to you?  For example, if you won't take a particular truth that you become aware of, and stand up to the person that's spreading a false teaching just because he's your Pastor, Elder, or whatever position bestowed upon him, what good does it do for you to know it?  If God gave you the truth, it was so you'd pass it on to the one who is incorrect in their thinking.  Being tactful is great if you're good at that.  I'm not.  Some people have a gift of eloquent speech.  I don't.  But I don't let such detractions stop me from making a point that needs to be made.  Do you really think God wants people to teach his word incorrectly?

I'm not saying we need to know every scripture in the Bible by heart.  We may even go too in depth on some things as it is, but we can agree that all knowledge is relevant in one way or another.  However, what procedure does your Church have in place to weed out false teaching by members, Elders or the Pastor if the shoe fits?  There is a scriptural procedure, to take the charge before the 'assembly', but to this day I've never set foot in a Church that follows it!  Pastors and Elders want you to bring your concerns to them, in private.  And I'm OK with that initially.  But at some point, if the charge of false teaching is a serious issue, not just just some minor point, but a serious doctrinal issue, let's follow what scripture says to do how about it!  After all, who is the assembly exactly?  Just the Pastors and Elders?  Or the members of the Church at large?

Just to prove the point, here's 2 common false teachings that are taught in pretty much EVERY CHURCH in this country today:

The Story Of Adam & Eve:

Here's a good explanation titled "WHAT WAS THE REAL SIN IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN?!? posted at -

But I would like to add to it some because it doesn't go far enough. In Genesis 3:15 God is speaking to the serpent, "and I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shall bruise his heel." Some Bibles translate 'seed' to 'children' which is correct and people really should understand what it means regardless.

Matthew 13:37-39 states, "He (Jesus) answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world; the good seed are the
children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; the enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the
reapers are the angels." Here again it's talking about people; seed = children, same concept as Gen 3:15.

In Revelation 12:9, "and the great Dragon was cast out, that old Serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world." Dragon in Revelation = the same entity who had physical children in Gen 3:15. There's a lot more versus that bear this out all through scripture from beginning to end. It's all in my videos:



My Perspective on the Condition of the Church Today:

Beyond a doubt, sometimes I think Christian people are about the most gullible people on this planet.  They have a Bible that talks about the enemies of God.  It identifies specific traits of these enemies, and says what kinds of things they'll be involved in, then, and in the future.  But if you point out these same things in society, and mention that all these people behind certain ungodly organizations all belong to one specific group of people, all of a sudden the people doing the ungodly actions you point to are said to be just 'misguided in their actions'.  They couldn't be enemies of Christians.  They couldn't be spending billions of dollars to kill us in all manners possible, deliberately trying to destroy the white Christian nations, trying to destroy our legal system, corrupt our government, our schools, our colleges, our banks, or any aspect of the society our fathers worked so hard to build.  

There can't be a group of insanely wealthy people that hate Christian people specifically.  Those gullible Christian people.  They don't know what a 'shill' is, or a 'plant', 'mole', 'agent', ... or whatever definitive words you want to use.  They don't understand or recognize fraud, treason, or espionage when they see it.  They don't know scripture, and usually I find that they don't really even want to know.  Because if they do know, then there's a responsibility to act on that information if they truly believe it and expose such crimes.  The same way you have a responsibility to report any crime you may see on the street.  And who has more responsibility to report a crime than your own pastor?  A pillar of the community.  The bedrock of any moral society.  You might keep in mind though, that most of the so called prophets in the Bible preached AGAINST other false teachers who generally were... OTHER PRIESTS!

Even the Pharisee's who were the leaders of the religious right in those days, Jesus called a host of bad things like liars, devil worshippers, destroyers of Gods word, children of the devil, etc, etc.  He knew specifically who they were and I'll point out below who they were and are in modern day.  There's nothing new under the sun.  Only some of these pastors truly don't realize they're preaching a false message, any more than the priests of Mikal's day knew they were wrong.  Saul (Paul) didn't know he was wrong, and he was in a position similar to the President Of the United States in comparison to his position of authority.  Maybe drop down a step or two, the Speaker Of The House, whatever!  That's like saying the Attorney General hasn't got a clue what the law means, even though he makes sure everyone else upholds it properly!  I've got a whole sermon on Saul at the bottom you should read titled "My Response to the CFC Church", because there was a key difference between Saul (Paul) and the rest of the Pharisee's that I don't think anyone has ever pointed out to you.

Here's a brilliant article called "The gullible mind explained" written by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger and Editor of NaturalNews.com -


Your preacher can be wrong.  He can be dead wrong, and he can even be wrong on purpose, and Christian's would be aghast any any such statement.  Go read your Bible again and tell me it's not so.  We have some pastors out there today that were selected by a 'handler' to deceive Christians, and they're not the least bit aware that they were specifically chosen, and their church was funded, for that purpose.  Specifically so they would deceive Christians.  It's kind of like someone today taking someone like Saul, as good as he was with God's law, or thought he was, and promoting him as a good Pastor.  Funding the building of his church.  Advertising it.  Not overdoing it, but enough to make it sustain itself at some point, and hopefully one day bring in some wealthy Christians to help it grow because 'Saul' gives such a dynamic 'message'.

The handler 'controller' knows the message his 'expert' Saul (the pastor) teaches is patently wrong on some or most major doctrinal issues, but then, he's really a Satan worshipper in disguise.  What better way to destroy Christianity than to get the christians to do it to themselves.  Less work for you, right!  Besides, you can always claim you thought he had a truthful message.  You can claim ignorance of his false teachings, just like everyone else that joined the church.  'Who knew?'  If they didn't know they were teaching their 'sheep' wrong, you can't really call them a shill.  They might just be as ignorant of God's word as Saul (Paul) was.  Knowing the word, but totally wrong about it just the same.  The word might of been deliberately withheld from them.  

You might of missed those scriptures too, but isn't that what happened with Mikal and the other priests?  An Angel was sent with a lying spirit.  Imagine..., God sending priests a lying spirit.  Bet they don't teach about that in any churches.  Might get people to start thinking and we wouldn't want that.  We want to be the ones that they trust to do their thinking for them.  We want to be the expert!  That's a real problem today.  People go to church for a couple of hours each week, and they must think they've fulfilled their responsibilities to God if they go, and do their best to follow God's law the rest of the week.

Did God's law come without enforcement?  What's any law without enforcement?  It's a recommendation, not a law.  We must follow the 10 recommendations these days, because the churches certainly don't preach enforcement of God's law, or even enlighten people to the fact there was ever any 'implementing regulations'.  Were we to enforce it on the assembly of God's people, or just shame people into following it?  Most of you reading this don't have any idea how this applies to us today, now, in our country.  Or in any country for that matter.  Such ignorance of God's word by so many people doesn't come by accident.

Train your son up in the way he should go and when he's older he won't depart from it.  Satan knows this is true, so he uses it against us.  Train people in the wrong doctrine, and the wrong ideas, and when they get older it gets almost impossible to convince them of the truth.  In fact they're lost for good, unless they have a spirit of truth within themselves.  They have to be willing to place truth above all else.  Above their job, their marriage, their friends, their family, their finances, etc.  Not an easy thing to do.  99% of the people are on the wrong track these days and don't have a clue because of the intense brainwashing they went through growing up in the typical 501C3 or 'incorporated' church.  It's a business folks, a corporation.

You know how I can tell if a pastor has any discernment of scripture whatsoever?  I use Revelation Chapter 9.  Revelation Chapter 9 is a doorway to understanding a large part of the book of Revelation.  A 10 year old child could understand Revelation Chapter 9 if it was explained properly.  98% of our pastors don't have a clue what it's talking about, though they may think they do if they've invited the current Revelation 'expert' to their church to speak.  I'm referring to teachers like Hilton Sutton for example.  Judging by his book on Revelation, he doesn't know more than what my 2 year old knows about it.  That may sound harsh, but how can you parade around an expert on Revelation that is, in reality, totally ignorant of what it says?  I'm not saying he knows zero about it, but on a scale of 1 - 100, I think he's about a 15... MAYBE.  Either that or he's deliberately misleading the churches.  In other words, he's a shill, a plant, agent, or whatever word you want to use.

I can say for sure if the pastors do know what it says, 99% of those 98% apparently aren't telling the flock.  There's such a small handful of pastors telling the truth I have no idea why God has allowed it to continue to this point.  If a person sincerely wants to teach God's word for a living, why doesn't God himself give that man discernment of his word so he teaches a true message?  There's a real spiritual problem there somewhere, and I can't say I have all the answers by any means, but there are some things that are easy to discern.  Now that we have the internet these days, a lot of this information is going more mainstream and people are asking questions.

Unlike some others, I blame the Pastor's for the downfall of our once  "Christian Nation".  Through incorporation, they've converted our churches into corporations, and given the ownership and control of the church over to the State of _____ (insert the name of your State).  By doing so, they've shed the constitutional protections that our fathers fought and died for, and traded their inalienable right in the first article of the Bill Of Rights, for a privilege granted by the government.  More importantly, they've violated the very first command of God, "There shall be no other God to you, except MYSELF".  They've allowed to State to tell the Church what it can do, and what it can't do, in violation of scripture, and in violation of the State and Federal Constitutions.  

If you say that 'OH, but they have to follow the laws of the State'; I would mention that according to the First Article of the Bill Of Rights, there are no legitimate laws State or Federal that tell Churches anything whatsoever.  The State can't pass a law contrary to the Bill Of Rights either, and whatever laws there are on the books today that apply to Churches, they're null and void according to the wording of the first article of the Bill Of Rights!  The Congressman or Legislators that passed those laws basically have committed treason!  There's your true 'Separation of Church and State'.  It's right there in Article 1 where it tells Congress that it has no power to tell a Church what to do!

Tell me it's not so, and why this is not correct, and I'll post your answer here along with all the law to the contrary.  For years now, former Chief Justice of Alabama Judge Roy Moore has been telling Churches that the 501C3 was null and void from the date of its inception.  I can name many others that are trying to teach Pastors about why the 501c3 is unlawful. 

Christian Attorney Jereald Finney has it all laid out for you on his site at -


These Congressman or Legislators that passed laws applying to Churches knew what they were doing when they passed them, and knew that they passed them in violation of the First Article of the Bill Of Rights.  They conspired from the very beginning to control Churches in various ways, knowing full well the Federal Constitution outlawed their actions.  They are the true outlaws!

They did it to convert something they knew they had no legitimate control over, into something they would eventually have complete control over.  Once you voluntarily give up your rights, and accept a privilege from the State, then you can lawfully be held to those new standards assuming you did it willingly, and with full disclosure.  Basically, you contracted with the State or Federal government or both in most instances, and now you're a 'corporate' church.  Now you can legally be forced to perform according to the contract you willfully signed.  If you want to argue that there wasn't full disclosure, then you have a case for fraud.  Fraud releases you from all contracts once proven, and there's no statute of limitations on fraud!

As a corporation, Churches have no choice but to follow whatever laws the State legislatures pass pertaining to corporation churches, whether they agree with them or not.  If they don't comply, they risk jail or seizure of property, or church assets.  According to the first article of the Bill of Rights, Congress is prevented from writing laws that apply to churches or interfering with the free exercise of religion.  That's what "No law..." means doesn't it?  Does Congress have a problem with the  meaning of the word "no," or did they merely write laws pertaining to church's with the intention of manipulating them into voluntary compliance with their laws through incorporation, therefore getting them to trade their rights for government protection?  It's interesting that the definition of "no" cannot be found in the 'Black's Law' legal dictionary - so maybe they really don't know what it means!  While you're there, look up the definition of 'person' and 'human being'.  Some humans are 'persons', and some aren't!

We're all familiar with the maxim of law that the created cannot be greater than the creator.  You don't have to read the whole bible to get that message loud and clear.  Why then, do the churches not get it?   The creator of the corporation in Texas for example is the State of Texas.  The creator of the 501c3 exemption is the Federal government.  Since a church has willingly participated in the creation of First Baptist Church Incorporated - (insert your corporate church name here), what makes them think that when the day rolls around that they decide that they can't follow some law that's passed that applies to them as a corporation, because it  conflicts with their scriptural teachings, they'll just protest by not doing what the law calls for?  Do they think that the State of Texas won't punish them for not doing what statute calls for?  Do they think that the State of Texas won't fine them or seize their church?  Churches have been fined.  Churches have been seized.  And church's have been attacked by tanks from our own government, and destroyed with many CHILDREN MURDERED in the process.  And by the way, that was for the express 'stated' purpose of 'saving' the children, was it not?  If that church had said First Baptist on the door, would you of demanded someone be held accountable then?  

We don't attack the Buddhist Temples and burn them down.  We don't attack the Jewish Synagogues and burn them down.  We don't attack the Muslims or Islamic's in this country, and we don't even attack the Church of Satan.  None of those churches even worship our God or believe in him which makes them enemies of our God according to our Bible, and they're free to do whatever they please in essence.  It is expressly a violation of our constitution to use the military against Citizens of these United States.

We've allowed our constitution to be violated and didn't hold the violators accountable because we think that the government will police itself.  I'm sorry, but we're many years down the road, overwhelming evidence has been presented that shows lie after lie by our government officials at Waco, and there's been a lot of talk, but what has been done?  The people responsible for the Waco 'holocaust' have not been tried and convicted of their crimes, and there were crimes committed, constitutional violations, and cold blooded murders committed as the FLIR Forward Looking Infrared Radar that was taken that day by the FBI clearly shows in the movie - Waco: The Rules of Engagement.

If Congress is incapable of doing what needs to be done or unwilling, then the responsibility falls back on the Dejure Citizens of our country to take action and see justice done.  Your fathers created the government, and as it says in the Preamble, you're the "Posterity" they created it for.  Now it's your responsibility to discuss what action needs to be taken and take it.  The government is not there to boss you around, it's there for you to tell it what YOU want done.  That was the plan originally.  You have a responsibility to do that.  Go read the Declaration Of Independence again and tell me I'm wrong.

Maybe you have forgotten the words of our fathers in the Declaration of Independence, but you have the same right to do what you wish with your government.  Abolish it if it needs abolishing, live with it if you can, replace it with another, or anything in-between.  If an elected judge has a right to sit in judgment of a citizen, since you were the creator of that branch of government he's operating in then certainly citizens as a group have not only the power to judge a citizens themselves, since YOU'RE DELEGATING THAT POWER TO HIM, but also the power to judge the judge if he gets out of line.  The only time you have less power than he has is when you have committed criminal acts.  If you're a Dejure Citizen, a member of the Posterity, then you not only have a right, but rather an obligation to hold your elected officials accountable for their actions.

Now think about that for a moment and just imagine a million of you guys heading up to DC to hold your own hearings in front of the Capitol where you're going to present evidence and hold trials and convict officials that committed crimes while in office, let's say, in relation to the Waco Holocaust for example.  These people haven't been tried yet, Congress isn't going to do it so you go up there and do it yourselves.  If you head up there unarmed, what's going to happen?  How far will you get?  If you build a gallows to hang these people on, how many do you think you can get on the end of that rope?

Would it work any better if you were armed?  Everybody from the President to the Pope would be calling it an outrage!  Either way, I can assure you that the government would call out every police force they have along with the military, their tanks if necessary, and whatever else they feel they need to protect themselves from the 'crazy Citizens' that think they have a right to hold them accountable for their actions without going through the 'proper' channels.  What are they afraid of?  Do they think that if we kick them out of their cushy little jobs and replace them with the most righteous men we have available, that somehow our way of life is going to come crumbling down?  Or do they just think that we'll uncover more than enough evidence to convict them of some crime worthy of hanging?  If they haven't committed any crimes against us, do they think we'll invent something because we're mad at them?  

It doesn't take much imagination to figure what's going to happen.  They're going to make criminals out of all of you.  Terrorists most likely.  That part about you being able to abolish your government, and replace it with another in the Declaration Of Independence isn't going to fly.  And they're going to sell that story to the public too, because the churchgoers in this country by and large don't remember what the Declaration of Independence says.  I can assure you they didn't STUDY the words in that document in any schools in this country in the last 100 years, must less even read them out loud.  We don't need to abolish it though, we need to enforce it.

You've probably never heard the pastor of your church even mention the name of one of your Christian Fathers that wrote the constitution that - you think - you're still living under today.  I'll bet money you never heard your pastor give a sermon about Noah Webster.  No mention about how he was a fine Christian man, and the things he did in his life that maybe we should try to emulate in some of ours or our children's.  No mention about his Christian values, and how they influenced generations of  other Christian men and women.  

Let's face it, your pastor teaches out of a history book that contains recorded history as far back as God saw fit to take it.  God didn't put a bunch of extra stuff in the Bible that we don't need to know or to read.  Doesn't it say in there somewhere that all scripture is profitable for knowledge and instruction?  Why then, do your preachers preach at best, only about 35% of the scriptures?  Here's a good example of 5 verses typically no Pastor will ever preach in an 'establishment' Church -

Drug, Druggist, Pharmacist, Medication, Pharmacy –

Sorcery, Witchcraft, Sorcerer

Gal 5:20  ...Idolatry, witchcraft, (Strong's Dictionary - 5331) hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,...  

Rev 18:23  And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (5331) were all nations deceived...  

5331  pharmakeia (far-mak-i'-ah); from 5332; medication ("pharmacy"), i.e. (by extension) magic (literally or figuratively):

KJV-- sorcery, witchcraft.


Rev 9:21  Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, (Strong's Dictionary - 5332) nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts...  

Rev 21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, (5332) and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death...  

Rev 22:15  For without are dogs, and sorcerers, (5332) and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie...  

5332  pharmakeus (far-mak-yoos');

from pharmakon (a drug, i.e. spell-giving potion); a druggist ("pharmacist") or poisoner, i.e. (by extension) a magician:

KJV-- sorcerer.


Strong's Dictionary - 5333  pharmakos (far-mak-os'); the same as 5332:

KJV-- sorcerer.

Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:

"pharmaceutical ... from Greek pharmakeutikos ... a medicinal drug."
"pharmaco- ... Greek pharmako-, from pharmakon ... medicine : drug."
"pharmacology ... the science of drugs."

"pharmacy ... from Greek
pharmakeia ... the art or practice of preparing, preserving, compounding, and dispensing drugs ... a place where medicines are compounded or dispensed ... DRUGSTORE."

On the Web see -



Webster's 1828 Dictionary - Pharmaceutic - PHARMACEU'TIC

PHARMACEU'TICAL, a. [Gr. to practice witchcraft or use medicine; poison or medicine.] Pertaining to the knowledge or art of pharmacy, or to the art of preparing medicines.


Thayer's Greek Definitions:

G5332     fa?µa?e?´?     pharmakeus

1) one who prepares or uses magical remedies

A Related Word by Thayr's/Strong's Number: from pharmakon (a drug, i.e. spell-giving potion) and G5331     fa?µa?e?´a     pharmakeia

1) the use or the administering of drugs
3) sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it
4) metaphorically the deceptions and seductions of idolatry.

Maybe they would say that there's just some things in the Bible that aren't that important for the everyday Christian to know.  For sure, I've heard the arguments of a few that say 'pharmakeia' was translated incorrectly and it pertains to what would be considered illegal today such as psychedelic drugs - LSD, acid, mescaline, psilocybin, mushrooms or cocaine, crystal meth, speed, downers, marijuana, etc, etc.  I don't know why the word pharmakeia would exclude these types of drugs considered illegal today, as I don't think we're going to use any of these things to help heal our bodies.  Pharmaceuticals do not heal our bodies either, they merely suppress symptoms, but they do have many uses in trauma care.  When you're sewing somebody back together that's been in an accident, I don't think there's a conflict of interest by using pharmaceuticals on a temporary basis to get them back on their feet.  I think we can find a wide range of uses for these types of drugs under these circumstances.  

But that's trauma care, and it's a temporary thing.  These drugs don't heal you, your body heals itself.  But they do allow you to get through a trauma to your body that might otherwise of been a worse injury or even a fatal injury.  When it comes to healthcare, keeping people on medication for years on end is the primary goal of the pharmaceutical industry, as that makes them billions of dollars of profit every year.  Managing sickness is the goal, and we're not talking about treating the common cold here.  The pharmaceutical industry has a virtual government authorized monopoly on healthcare, and does everything in it's power to discount any other healthcare choices besides pharmaceuticals.  We don't need the pharmaceutical industry in any way shape or form when it comes to any of our normal 'healthcare' problems.  

But I digress.  Our pastors are ashamed of what their forefathers created, because when they wrote the constitution they only included themselves in it (the white Anglo-Saxon peoples from the original stock of Europe).  There's a reason they didn't want to create a government that imparted their God given rights to foreigners, because they knew that these people for the most part worshipped other Gods.  They couldn't give equal rights under the constitution to someone that worshipped Budda, or Mohammed, or the Sun, or whatever the name of their God was it really didn't matter.  In the Christian faith, our Bible tells us that there's only ONE God, and ALL other Gods are in reality false gods, and are Satan himself.

It would of been in direct opposition to our Gods teachings in Deuteronomy 17:2 to allow foreigners that worship other Gods into our country, because God himself said to put those people to death when they're discovered among you.  Being a more civilized people, and more forgiving these days, it appears they decided the way to keep such things out of our country was to control immigration, and control any foreigners already present by not giving them citizenship or recognizing these people to have unalienable rights.  To control them absolutely by passing any laws the government deemed necessary to keep such false religions from proliferating within our borders.

This is the essence of what the 14th amendment does and why it was passed, if you agree it was properly passed.  It doesn't take a constitutional scholar to recognize the fact that the Negro's (Black race) in our land obviously didn't have unalienable rights at the passing of the constitution, or any of the Asians that may of been here (Mongoloid race - yellow), or any Indians (East Indian race - brown, or West Indian race - red), or any of the ethnic groups.  That's why you always hear all non-whites reference 'civil rights' instead of 'unalienable rights' when they're referring to rights violations.  A simple dictionary will show you the difference between the two if you can read and understand English, but the landmark court case that is still positive law to this day, and has NEVER been overturned as it relates to the fact that non-whites do not have the same rights as whites, is the Dred Scott case of 1857.  

Keep in mind that this case was heard AFTER the Civil War was over.  You remember, the war that freed the 'slaves'.  Its 172 pages are not an easy read even for someone that reads such things every day, and is certainly one of those cases that fostered the term 'legalspeak'.  Although certain parts of it have been overturned in relation to other 14th amendment 'civil rights' issues, it's still the most current law available as of 2011 that relates to Dejure Citizens.  It was used in the more recent 1997 U.S. Supreme Court 'Dejure Citizenship' case from Houston, Texas, the Barbara Martin case.  Read the memorandum of law and it's all laid out for you.  So much so that someone in the White House or Congress placed a National Secrecy order on the case and made the USSC judges ruling secret!  When the ruling is in their favor they go on TV and talk about it.  When it's in favor of a common citizen that wants to enforce their rights, they use the power of the government to suppress the truth.  This is who we're electing to office.  Liars and deceivers.

No one is contesting the fact that a person can be of any race or ethnic group and accept Jesus Christ, and have the same ability to obtain grace and everlasting life as any other... I've pointed that out on this page, but under our constitution, only whites are recognized to have 'unalienable' rights.  Since the Church teaches the truth that we're all the same in the eyes of Christ once we've accepted him into our lives, how can they justify telling these same people should they be Black, Eastern / Western Indian, or Asian that they have different laws that apply to them than applies to the Dejure Citizenry that founded our country.  

Especially when they've fought alongside the whites in times of war to secure what they assumed were basically the same rights everyone else had?  You would think that just telling the truth would suffice, but I could probably count on just my fingers and toes the number of pastors that will stand up in front of a congregation of even 50 or more people and tell the truth.  Like I said, how do you tell them that our forefathers made them different under the law, but Christ sees them as equal and in fact we teach that they're our brothers in Christ?

See - The 14th Amendment Clarified

I think there is a way and here again, it comes back to the difference between telling the truth and 'tickling the ears of your congregation', as our God himself said about pastors.  It amazes me how pastors can teach just the parts of the Bible they think are relevant at any give time, but not teach many parts of the Bible at any time in their career, or even teach 'Jewish fables' for example which the Bible explicitly warns us about.  

Their false teachings that 'the Jews of today are 'God's Chosen' in the Bible' should get them removed from the pulpit.  Granted, they teach many things in the Bible very well, but then they turn right around and make intellectually dishonest statements that Abraham was a Jew for example, when "Jews" didn't even exist at that point in time.  Or that Moses was a Jew, which was impossible no matter how much you twist scripture.  You may notice that in the list of things God hates, a liar makes the list twice, while a prostitute doesn't make the list even once.  Calling Abraham a Jew is at best dishonest, at worst a fraud.  Since many have banded together to spread this fraud far and wide we could easily call it a conspiracy.  If it's not true, let's quit teaching it.

You can read angloisrael.com or anglo-saxonisrael.com for more background information on the lie about the Jews being Israel.  I call it a lie because I'm convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is.  You'll have to come to your own conclusions based on the evidence presented.  If you agree, then confront those that are responsible for spreading this lie..., if not then there's no issue in your mind.  But if you see the failings in their teachings as I do, then let us educate ourselves, and use our newfound knowledge to correct this error in teaching by standing up to those in your church that are teaching it.  Leaving your church in search for another is not always the answer.  If you confront your pastor and he studies this information that's all you can expect.  If he's a man of God he'll either agree with it or he won't.  Either way you've done your duty to stand up for what you see is right.  Now the balls in his court.  All the church can do is ask you to not come back, and I wouldn't leave until I was asked to leave.

I've had pastor's tell me they knew this teaching was correct, but that they couldn't teach it because they'd be fired from their job.  They liked the amenities too much to loose their job!  As a pastor, once you're tossed out for teaching this message, you can be in effect blacklisted, and not be able to teach again in any of the large establishment churches.  Your income will take a dramatic downturn, and you won't be able to live in the way you were accustomed on that much bigger salary you had at the large church.

You know, I'm simply a mechanic by trade, I have no degrees beside my name and I may have little to show for my life if you're counting material things, but I asked for only one thing from God when I decided to be a Christian, and that was for him to show me the TRUTH of his scriptures.  I had been in many churches in my life and I could see that most pastors could provide great insight into scripture, far beyond what I could get out of it when reading it for myself.  But I saw that outside of those walls it had very little effect.  There's no action being preached these days.  The message is only for those that are there that day.  In essence they're one scripture preachers, and they're preaching to the choir.  What is their plan for getting rid of abortion in this country?  What is their plan for shutting down the porn industry?   Does the Bible teach tolerance of such abominations taking place among us?

Some say 'well unfortunately our laws allow such things and as Christian's we're commanded to follow the law and abide by the decisions of our governors, judges', etc..  What ignorance!  You can read one scripture and not another.  Of course it said to follow those decisions, and what did it say before that?  It said to put your most righteous men into positions of authority.  It said that judges were to be what?  Not just Levites, not Priests, but CHIEF PRIESTS!  Men that absolutely could not be bribed or pressured because of someone's status in the community.  Men that would render a fair and just decision based on the facts and circumstances of the case, even if it meant ruling against the rich person with all his money and influence.  Of course we were to follow the decisions of these CHIEF PRIESTS!  That makes sense doesn't it?

So maybe we don't have Chief Priests today in the same sense we had them in that day, but usually we have a head Pastor, and associate Pastors or something similar.  So we can consider the head Pastor as the 'Chief Priest' in today's world.  Wouldn't you feel better as a Citizen, going into court knowing that the head Pastor of your Church or some other Church was sitting in judgment?  Maybe you haven't had the opportunity to witness this first hand like many others that are in jail right now have, but people have lost their cases many times because the judge disallowed evidence to be admitted into evidence that, had it been presented to the jury, would of most likely of exonerated them.  The evidence would of shown the jury what a sham the trial was, but the judge wouldn't allow it to be presented to the jury.  This is how a government wins cases when people have the evidence to expose the truth that they're not guilty, but the judge (who is the real criminal most times), joins sides with the prosecution (who is also the real criminal most times), to make sure the government wins at all costs.  If you haven't experienced this yet, there's a real good chance you will in your lifetime, as it's rampant in our courtrooms these days.

Even court reporters can be on the side of the judge or prosecutor.  I bought a transcript one time of a trial I had in traffic court.  This is like I guess, the lowest court in the country, right?  A judge can get real mad when they're exposed to the truth!  I bought the transcript because there were a few times in the conversation that some truth came out, and I wanted to show what the judge said in open court to some other law students I was studying law with at the time.  Once, the judge got so mad she yelled at me and told me to shut up and sit down.  Imagine my surprise when those 3 parts of the trial were left out of the transcript!  The only 3 things that were important, and when you get to that part it says "...(couldn't hear what the judge said)" or "... (words were mumbled).  When the judge yelled at me you could of heard what she said in the next courtroom!  That court reporter was worse than just a liar!

Again, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the Supreme Court of the State Of Texas control all lower courts, and all other State Supreme Courts do the same thing?  Doesn't the Supreme Court of the State Of _____ (insert the name of your State here), command the lower courts in the front section of your Civil and Criminal code books to follow the rules of procedure laid out in those books?  Why is it they hold us accountable to those procedures, and penalize us if we don't follow them to the letter, but when they openly violate these procedures, the judge can overlook the fault of the prosecution, and the judge can ignore the procedures themselves with absolute impunity?  Do you really think that somehow the Supreme Court of the State Of Texas doesn't know what goes on in traffic court?  They do and they condone it, and if they condone the corruption that goes on in every traffic court in this country them every Supreme Court of the State Of _____ (insert the name of your State here), is just as guilty of the corruption themselves.

The effect of the law is that today, you can't even get a righteous judge in the lowest court in the land, a simple traffic court.  There's not even ONE JUDGE in ANY TRAFFIC COURT IN THIS COUNTRY who can claim to be righteous - NOT ONE!  How do I know that?  Because every one lies to the citizens that show up for court, and if they don't, I'd like to know what judge doesn't so I can move to their county, and live in peace.  Here's the long version of how they lie, but I'll give you a simple version.  If you ask the judge next time you show up for traffic court, whether their court is a civil court or a criminal court, they'll tell you it's a criminal court.  If it's criminal, then you have a right to see the criminal complaint.  I can't speak for all states, but get a copy of your State Constitution, and the book with the Criminal Code for your state.

Within these 2 books you'll find out that they're required to provide all criminal defendants with a copy of the criminal complaint in ALL Criminal Proceedings, traffic court or not (if one is requested) or in some cases - it uses the wording if 'demanded'.  So I demand if I need to, because judges will routinely say there's no criminal complaint needed in their 'criminal' court.  Also you should see some wording to the effect that all criminal charges are to be listed in the criminal code.  'ALL' means all doesn't it, or does all really mean 'some'?  The so called 'criminal' traffic laws are not in the criminal code, except for driving under the influence of drugs, or alcohol, or some such crime.  OK, so who signs the criminal complaint against you, assuming you get this far before your case is dismissed?  Who is your accuser?  You have a right to face your accuser in a criminal trial don't you?  The cop is the witness of the 'crime', not the one accusing you of a crime, he just saw you do it and will testify to that effect.  He typically knows nothing about the law himself, although if he's enforcing those statutes as part of his job, don't you think he should be required to as part of his training?

OK, so the clerk for the judge you're appearing before signs the complaint in all the cases I've seen!!!  But wait a minute, what about that 'separation of powers' thing we've always heard of?  Besides that, doesn't the clerk also sign the judge's name to many court documents?  So the clerk is acting on the judge's behalf, and these people claim to be following the law???  How can the clerk of the court for the judge you're standing in front of, make a criminal complaint against you, and not violate the separation of powers doctrine we've all heard about?  This is an interesting question for your lawyer friends.  And before you ask them about this, go to a law library and pull out a corpus juris secundum, and look up the definition of the word "client".  We all know what a client is don't we?  Believe me, the trip to the library will be worth it. 


"The right to travel on the public highways is a constitutional right." - Teche Lines v. Danforth, Miss. 12 So 2d 784, 787.

"The right to travel is part of the 'liberty' that a citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law." - Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116; U.S. v. Laub 385 U.S. 475

"The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived." - Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163.

"Operation of a motor vehicle upon public streets and highways is not a mere privilege but is a right or liberty protected by the guarantees of Federal and State constitutions." - Adams v. City of Pocatello 416 P2d 46

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E. 579

"The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the Right to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees..." - Berberian v. Lussier 139 A2d 869, 872 (1958)

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." - Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491. (yes, THAT Miranda.)

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

And by the way, you don't need a license to exercise a right.  You get a license to exercise a priviledge.  You just read what the courts had to say about driving being a right.  Who's lying to you now?  Lawyers, Judges, Congressmen, Media, etc.  Do you seriously think they don't know it?  They conspired to create a communist government to control the Christian people in this country, along with everyone else of course.  But they did it right under your nose and you're so ignorant you can't even recognize communism when you see it right in front of your eyes!  You sold your children into slavery in more ways than one.  Is that really just ignorance, or is it stupidity?  Wake up.  Take the red pill.

Our founding fathers intended for us to put our most righteous men into all these government offices to rule over us, but are we doing that today?  Are we electing our most righteous men into all these positions?  Where are our most righteous men if they're not the ones sitting in church pews beside you on Sundays?  What is your church doing to help these men get elected?  Nothing!  Oh yeah right, I remember now, it's because the un-righteous men that were elected in the past made up some laws, and passed them to say your church (make that church corporation, church entity, church organization, etc.), cannot be directly involved in electing specific people for office without losing their 'tax exempt' status.  There must be a reason for a law like that, but I just can't imagine what it was or who it benefits exactly.

By the way.  Few of you will understand this concept, but Churches are not tax exempt and never have been.  Churches are simply 'not taxable' under the Federal Constitution!  You should listen to former Alabama Chief Justice, Judge Roy Moore speak on this issue.  Don't listen to me.  He lays it out for you in a really nice presentation.  He'll even come right to your church and speak for the right price.


I see too many scriptures that are avoided or appeared to be misrepresented in meaning by pastors or teachers.  I always thought that they were the ones with the PhD, so I had to trust that they were infinitely more qualified to know what those scriptures really meant.  Maybe I was mistaken in my views.   After years of reading and study of the Bible for myself, what I've seen so far is that the majority of pastors were only "Pastor's without Pastures." (PDF file)  The purpose of this site is to promote ACTION on behalf of Christians in America that see the same problems with this country I see and are willing to do something to help straighten this country out.  For example, as Christians there's things we cannot tolerate in this country and a key issue is abortion.  If we don't put an end to it, I assure you God will, and you won't like his solution.  

What plan does your Church have to put and end to abortion?  They all teach that it's murder correct?  Well approximately 50 million MURDERS have been committed by THEIR OWN admission, and have the pastors in your town ever even met for lunch one day to consider how they might put a stop to it?  Have they discussed the porn industry?  And these are the same people that think they're so righteous that they're going to fly away to Heaven in the Rapture?  Does that scan... at all?

What plan does your Church have to put and end to pornography just right there in your own community?  Does your Church have any plans to do anything other than just to 'save souls'?  Since we haven't stopped abortion, now we have an even greater evil... the sale of aborted baby body parts.  There's a lot of money being made selling body parts for research whether you knew it or not.  In Japan right now, they're preparing and cooking aborted babies, and selling parts of these babies in restaurants as a delicacy!  

This will come to an end I assure you.  The question is, will you be a part of the action to put a stop to it, or will you try to ignore it and hope it goes away?  If God asks you, 'Well you were aware of all of these evil things going on in your own town no less.'  'So what did you do to fight the good fight and put an end to such abomination?'  'How were you salt and light in your community?'  And your answer is what exactly? 

Here's a start.  I doubt many people read this far, but for those that did I have a substantial $40 gift for some of you.  My action plan is to help educate others the best I can with the knowledge I've been blessed with.  To counteract all the false teachings in the churches these days I'd like to point you to a few websites where you can read up on a lot of the information that's been withheld from you.  Above, I said you can read angloisrael.com or anglo-saxonisrael.com for more background information on the lie about the Jews being Israel.  There are also a few sites where you can buy books that aren't available in your local so called 'christian' bookstore that will help you build a personal library of info on everything the churches don't teach about scripture.  They can't get too deep into a lot of scripture because too many people would question them about the obvious contradictions to their 'doctrine'.

So there's a lot of good books available for study into the 'Israel Message', meaning what modern day people do exactly fit the prophecies of the 12 tribes.  Some people call that 'Christian Identity', 'Israel Identity', or 'Identity Teaching', the 'Identity Message', etc.  But on Eli James' site at - anglo-saxonisrael.com, he has a very good book for sale there that he wrote himself.  It spans a range of history and goes into the real identity of the people we call the Jews today, and covers at least 20 years of personal study he's done into this question.  He gets $40 for his book called "The Great Impersonation: How the Anti-Christ has Deceived the Whole World". 

There are a few well known publishers that sell books on Identity where you can buy all you would ever want to read:

Destiny Publishers
P.O. Box 177
Merrimac, Massachusetts, 01860-0177

Artisan Publishers
aka Hoffman Printing
1409 West Shawnee
Muskogee, OK 74401


Listen to We The People - Texas Coordinators on internet talk radio  

Onsite Links

Politely invited to conform or leave the CFC Church in Tomball  (PDF File)

My Response to the CFC Church  (PDF File)

Famous Quotes

Public Law 97-280 - Congress honors the Bible as Holy Scripture

Drugs and Sorcery

National Campaign to Stop Pornography

Why Have Our Churches Been Silenced?

The Myth of a Judeo-Christian Tradition

The Gun is Civilization

He Is Risen - by Pastor Chuck Baldwin

Making A Mockery Of Marriage

America on the Fast Track Toward Destruction!

Avian Flu: Are YOU Ready to Die for the Establishment?

The Dynamics of Organized Corruption in the Courts

What Is the Cause of the Economic Meltdown? - by Pastor Eli James

Nearly all drug trials scientifically invalid due to influence of the mind; Big Pharma science dissolves into wishful thinking - by Mike Adams

Psych Drug Shocker: Antidepressant Drugs Work No Better than Placebo; Big Pharma Hoax Finally Exposed - by Mike Adams

U.S. Supreme Court denies parents of vaccine damaged children their right to seek justice - by Mike Adams


More to come...