I Blame the Pastors

iblamethepastors.com

Last Update 5/24/2015

If you don't like to read and you're not a Christian anyway, I think George Carlin sums up our problems in this country pretty good in his video on youtube.com titled, "George Carlin: The American Dream" - 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q

I'm certainly not a Carlin fan and he's dead now, but I think he's accurate in what he says and a lot of people did listen to his analogies on society.  I care about truth, not who the speaker is so much.  Find me a Christian speaker who people will listen to and I'll use their video, because there must be one posted somewhere without all the cuss words... So someone sent me the following link and I agree that it sums up the problem:

If you really think you couldn't possibly be totally brainwashed about your government and who really runs it behind the scenes, I think this video by Eustace Mullins will prove the point: The New World Order & Federal Reserve Bank -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8KLsfMBxZo

Former Communist Party official Manning Johnson testified in 1953 before the House Un-American Activities Committee: “Once the tactic of infiltration of religious organizations was set by the Kremlin … the Communists discovered that the destruction of religion could proceed much faster through infiltration of the Church by Communists operating within the Church itself. … it would be necessary to concentrate Communists in the seminaries. … This policy … was successful beyond … expectations.”

In the early 1950s, Mrs. Bella V. Dodd, former high-ranking official of the American Communist Party, testified before the same HUAC: “In the 1930s we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within.” and “Right now they are in the highest places in the Church.” She predicted changes so drastic that “you will not recognize the Church.”

Dr. Alice von Hildebrand: “Bella Dodd told my husband and me that when she was an active party member, she had dealt with no fewer than four cardinals within the Vatican ‘who were working for us’.” (Latin Mass Magazine, Summer 2001)

In Public Law 313 (4-14-1952), the Federal government admitted that its support of the United Nations is unconstitutional and contingent upon its continuing to operate under “emergency powers.”  It said: “Whereas the existing state of war…and the termination thereof…would render certain statutory provisions inoperative….and Whereas some of these statutory provisions are needed to insure the…capacity of the United States to support the United Nations…it is desirable to extend these statutory provisions.”  Incidentally, the enemy in this “war” is the American people; a story you will find in To Tame a Tyrant.

According to Mr. Carl Rix, former President of the American Bar Association, America’s biblically based Constitution was replaced by the United Nations Charter.  In Senate testimony on May 11, 1955, he summarized the death of our Constitution by saying: “Congress is no longer bound by its Constitutional system of delegated power.  Its only test is under the obligatory power to promote human rights (not to be confused with the unalienable rights guaranteed by our Constitution) in these fields of endeavor: Civil, political, economic, social and cultural.  These (powers) are found in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations.  Congress may now legislate as an uninhibited body with no shackles of delegated powers under the Constitution.  Our entire system of government of delegated powers of Congress has been changed to a system of undelegated powers without amendment (of the Constitution) by the people of the United States.”

A Brainwashed Christian:

The first thing I think we need to agree on is that you can be a Pastor, Elder, Teacher, Deacon, etc, or just attend a Church, Tabernacle, or any of those names you want to apply to your building or your group of worshippers to learn more about God's word; and participate in any way you can to further those teachings in your world, and you can be brainwashed and totally wrong about what scripture teaches in the Bible.  If you don't believe that, then you missed all those verses about false teachers in the Bible.  If you listen to false teachers, and you're convinced what they're teaching you is truth, then you're brainwashed. 

There's no two ways about it.  You can continue your whole life believing in God's word, believing you know what scripture means to whatever the extent of your learning has been, and most of what you know can be absolutely wrong.  It's wrong because your teachers had no discernment of the truth of God's word, and maybe you didn't either.

But the way to make sure you break out of any false teachings, is to appeal to God for the truth.  GOD IS TRUTH, but it still depends on the desires of your heart whether he enlightens you to any of his word or not.  We can argue about God's word till the cows come home, but unless GOD HIMSELF gives you discernment, all we'll be doing is disagreeing on what God's word actually says.  You must have a desire for truth, regardless of what the truth happens to be.  If the truth convicts you of sin, then so be it.  If you don't particularly want other people to know a specific truth about yourself, and the truth comes out, you need to admit it, face it, and repent from it.

If it's easier to cover it up because it would create too much embarrassment, what do you do?  Why should God give you discernment, if truth is not of primary importance to you?  For example, if you won't take a particular truth that you become aware of, and stand up to the person that's spreading a false teaching just because he's your Pastor, Elder, or whatever position bestowed upon him, what good does it do for you to know it?  If God gave you the truth, it was so you'd pass it on to the one who is incorrect in their thinking.  Being tactful is great if you're good at that.  I'm not.  Some people have a gift of eloquent speech.  I don't.  But I don't let such detractions stop me from making a point that needs to be made.  Do you really think God wants people to teach his word incorrectly?

I'm not saying we need to know every scripture in the Bible by heart.  We may even go too in depth on some things as it is, but we can agree that all knowledge is relevant in one way or another.  However, what procedure does your Church have in place to weed out false teaching by members, Elders or the Pastor if the shoe fits?  There is a scriptural procedure, to take the charge before the 'assembly', but to this day I've never set foot in a Church that follows it!  Pastors and Elders want you to bring your concerns to them, in private.  And I'm OK with that initially.  But at some point, if the charge of false teaching is a serious issue, not just just some minor point, but a serious doctrinal issue, let's follow what scripture says to do how about it!  After all, who is the assembly exactly?  Just the Pastors and Elders?  Or the members of the Church at large?

Just to prove the point, here's 2 common false teachings that are taught in pretty much EVERY CHURCH in this country today:

The Story Of Adam & Eve:

Here's a good explanation titled "WHAT WAS THE REAL SIN IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN?!? posted at -
http://biblestudysite.com/realsin.htm

But I would like to add to it some because it doesn't go far enough. In Genesis 3:15 God is speaking to the serpent, "and I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shall bruise his heel." Some Bibles translate 'seed' to 'children' which is correct and people really should understand what it means regardless.

Matthew 13:37-39 states, "He (Jesus) answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world; the good seed are the
children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; the enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the
reapers are the angels." Here again it's talking about people; seed = children, same concept as Gen 3:15.

In Revelation 12:9, "and the great Dragon was cast out, that old Serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world." Dragon in Revelation = the same entity who had physical children in Gen 3:15. There's a lot more versus that bear this out all through scripture from beginning to end. It's all in my videos:

http://www.youtube.com/user/rev9video/videos

My Perspective on the Condition of the Church Today:

Beyond a doubt, sometimes I think Christian people are about the most gullible people on this planet.  They have a Bible that talks about the enemies of God.  It identifies specific traits of these enemies, and says what kinds of things they'll be involved in, then, and in the future.  But if you point out these same things in society, and mention that all these people behind certain ungodly organizations all belong to one specific group of people, all of a sudden the people doing the ungodly actions you point to are said to be just 'misguided in their actions'.  They couldn't be enemies of Christians.  They couldn't be spending billions of dollars to kill us in all manners possible, deliberately trying to destroy the white Christian nations, trying to destroy our legal system, corrupt our government, our schools, our colleges, our banks, or any aspect of the society our fathers worked so hard to build.  

There can't be a group of insanely wealthy people that hate Christian people specifically.  Those gullible Christian people.  They don't know what a 'shill' is, or a 'plant', 'mole', 'agent', ... or whatever definitive words you want to use.  They don't understand or recognize fraud, treason, or espionage when they see it.  They don't know scripture, and usually I find that they don't really even want to know.  Because if they do know, then there's a responsibility to act on that information if they truly believe it and expose such crimes.  The same way you have a responsibility to report any crime you may see on the street.  And who has more responsibility to report a crime than your own pastor?  A pillar of the community.  The bedrock of any moral society.  You might keep in mind though, that most of the so called prophets in the Bible preached AGAINST other false teachers who generally were... OTHER PRIESTS!

Even the Pharisee's who were the leaders of the religious right in those days, Jesus called a host of bad things like liars, devil worshippers, destroyers of Gods word, children of the devil, etc, etc.  He knew specifically who they were and I'll point out below who they were and are in modern day.  There's nothing new under the sun.  Only some of these pastors truly don't realize they're preaching a false message, any more than the priests of Mikal's day knew they were wrong.  Saul (Paul) didn't know he was wrong, and he was in a position similar to the President Of the United States in comparison to his position of authority.  Maybe drop down a step or two, the Speaker Of The House, whatever!  That's like saying the Attorney General hasn't got a clue what the law means, even though he makes sure everyone else upholds it properly!  I've got a whole sermon on Saul at the bottom you should read titled "My Response to the CFC Church", because there was a key difference between Saul (Paul) and the rest of the Pharisee's that I don't think anyone has ever pointed out to you.

Here's a brilliant article called "The gullible mind explained" written by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger and Editor of NaturalNews.com -

naturalnews.com/032293_gullible_minds.html

Your preacher can be wrong.  He can be dead wrong, and he can even be wrong on purpose, and Christian's would be aghast any any such statement.  Go read your Bible again and tell me it's not so.  We have some pastors out there today that were selected by a 'handler' to deceive Christians, and they're not the least bit aware that they were specifically chosen, and their church was funded, for that purpose.  Specifically so they would deceive Christians.  It's kind of like someone today taking someone like Saul, as good as he was with God's law, or thought he was, and promoting him as a good Pastor.  Funding the building of his church.  Advertising it.  Not overdoing it, but enough to make it sustain itself at some point, and hopefully one day bring in some wealthy Christians to help it grow because 'Saul' gives such a dynamic 'message'.

The handler 'controller' knows the message his 'expert' Saul (the pastor) teaches is patently wrong on some or most major doctrinal issues, but then, he's really a Satan worshipper in disguise.  What better way to destroy Christianity than to get the christians to do it to themselves.  Less work for you, right!  Besides, you can always claim you thought he had a truthful message.  You can claim ignorance of his false teachings, just like everyone else that joined the church.  'Who knew?'  If they didn't know they were teaching their 'sheep' wrong, you can't really call them a shill.  They might just be as ignorant of God's word as Saul (Paul) was.  Knowing the word, but totally wrong about it just the same.  The word might of been deliberately withheld from them.  

You might of missed those scriptures too, but isn't that what happened with Mikal and the other priests?  An Angel was sent with a lying spirit.  Imagine..., God sending priests a lying spirit.  Bet they don't teach about that in any churches.  Might get people to start thinking and we wouldn't want that.  We want to be the ones that they trust to do their thinking for them.  We want to be the expert!  That's a real problem today.  People go to church for a couple of hours each week, and they must think they've fulfilled their responsibilities to God if they go, and do their best to follow God's law the rest of the week.

Did God's law come without enforcement?  What's any law without enforcement?  It's a recommendation, not a law.  We must follow the 10 recommendations these days, because the churches certainly don't preach enforcement of God's law, or even enlighten people to the fact there was ever any 'implementing regulations'.  Were we to enforce it on the assembly of God's people, or just shame people into following it?  Most of you reading this don't have any idea how this applies to us today, now, in our country.  Or in any country for that matter.  Such ignorance of God's word by so many people doesn't come by accident.

Train your son up in the way he should go and when he's older he won't depart from it.  Satan knows this is true, so he uses it against us.  Train people in the wrong doctrine, and the wrong ideas, and when they get older it gets almost impossible to convince them of the truth.  In fact they're lost for good, unless they have a spirit of truth within themselves.  They have to be willing to place truth above all else.  Above their job, their marriage, their friends, their family, their finances, etc.  Not an easy thing to do.  99% of the people are on the wrong track these days and don't have a clue because of the intense brainwashing they went through growing up in the typical 501C3 or 'incorporated' church.  It's a business folks, a corporation.

You know how I can tell if a pastor has any discernment of scripture whatsoever?  I use Revelation Chapter 9.  Revelation Chapter 9 is a doorway to understanding a large part of the book of Revelation.  A 10 year old child could understand Revelation Chapter 9 if it was explained properly.  98% of our pastors don't have a clue what it's talking about, though they may think they do if they've invited the current Revelation 'expert' to their church to speak.  I'm referring to teachers like Hilton Sutton for example.  Judging by his book on Revelation, he doesn't know more than what my 2 year old knows about it.  That may sound harsh, but how can you parade around an expert on Revelation that is, in reality, totally ignorant of what it says?  I'm not saying he knows zero about it, but on a scale of 1 - 100, I think he's about a 15... MAYBE.  Either that or he's deliberately misleading the churches.  In other words, he's a shill, a plant, agent, or whatever word you want to use.

I can say for sure if the pastors do know what it says, 99% of those 98% apparently aren't telling the flock.  There's such a small handful of pastors telling the truth I have no idea why God has allowed it to continue to this point.  If a person sincerely wants to teach God's word for a living, why doesn't God himself give that man discernment of his word so he teaches a true message?  There's a real spiritual problem there somewhere, and I can't say I have all the answers by any means, but there are some things that are easy to discern.  Now that we have the internet these days, a lot of this information is going more mainstream and people are asking questions.

Unlike some others, I blame the Pastor's for the downfall of our once  "Christian Nation".  Through incorporation, they've converted our churches into corporations, and given the ownership and control of the church over to the State of _____ (insert the name of your State).  By doing so, they've shed the constitutional protections that our fathers fought and died for, and traded their inalienable right in the first article of the Bill Of Rights, for a privilege granted by the government.  More importantly, they've violated the very first command of God, "There shall be no other God to you, except MYSELF".  They've allowed to State to tell the Church what it can do, and what it can't do, in violation of scripture, and in violation of the State and Federal Constitutions.  

If you say that 'OH, but they have to follow the laws of the State'; I would mention that according to the First Article of the Bill Of Rights, there are no legitimate laws State or Federal that tell Churches anything whatsoever.  The State can't pass a law contrary to the Bill Of Rights either, and whatever laws there are on the books today that apply to Churches, they're null and void according to the wording of the first article of the Bill Of Rights!  The Congressman or Legislators that passed those laws basically have committed treason!  There's your true 'Separation of Church and State'.  It's right there in Article 1 where it tells Congress that it has no power to tell a Church what to do!

Tell me it's not so, and why this is not correct, and I'll post your answer here along with all the law to the contrary.  For years now, former Chief Justice of Alabama Judge Roy Moore has been telling Churches that the 501C3 was null and void from the date of its inception.  I can name many others that are trying to teach Pastors about why the 501c3 is unlawful. 

Christian Attorney Jereald Finney has it all laid out for you on his site at -

http://churchandstatelaw.com

These Congressman or Legislators that passed laws applying to Churches knew what they were doing when they passed them, and knew that they passed them in violation of the First Article of the Bill Of Rights.  They conspired from the very beginning to control Churches in various ways, knowing full well the Federal Constitution outlawed their actions.  They are the true outlaws!

They did it to convert something they knew they had no legitimate control over, into something they would eventually have complete control over.  Once you voluntarily give up your rights, and accept a privilege from the State, then you can lawfully be held to those new standards assuming you did it willingly, and with full disclosure.  Basically, you contracted with the State or Federal government or both in most instances, and now you're a 'corporate' church.  Now you can legally be forced to perform according to the contract you willfully signed.  If you want to argue that there wasn't full disclosure, then you have a case for fraud.  Fraud releases you from all contracts once proven, and there's no statute of limitations on fraud!

As a corporation, Churches have no choice but to follow whatever laws the State legislatures pass pertaining to corporation churches, whether they agree with them or not.  If they don't comply, they risk jail or seizure of property, or church assets.  According to the first article of the Bill of Rights, Congress is prevented from writing laws that apply to churches or interfering with the free exercise of religion.  That's what "No law..." means doesn't it?  Does Congress have a problem with the  meaning of the word "no," or did they merely write laws pertaining to church's with the intention of manipulating them into voluntary compliance with their laws through incorporation, therefore getting them to trade their rights for government protection?  It's interesting that the definition of "no" cannot be found in the 'Black's Law' legal dictionary - so maybe they really don't know what it means!  While you're there, look up the definition of 'person' and 'human being'.  Some humans are 'persons', and some aren't!

We're all familiar with the maxim of law that the created cannot be greater than the creator.  You don't have to read the whole bible to get that message loud and clear.  Why then, do the churches not get it?   The creator of the corporation in Texas for example is the State of Texas.  The creator of the 501c3 exemption is the Federal government.  Since a church has willingly participated in the creation of First Baptist Church Incorporated - (insert your corporate church name here), what makes them think that when the day rolls around that they decide that they can't follow some law that's passed that applies to them as a corporation, because it  conflicts with their scriptural teachings, they'll just protest by not doing what the law calls for?  Do they think that the State of Texas won't punish them for not doing what statute calls for?  Do they think that the State of Texas won't fine them or seize their church?  Churches have been fined.  Churches have been seized.  And church's have been attacked by tanks from our own government, and destroyed with many CHILDREN MURDERED in the process.  And by the way, that was for the express 'stated' purpose of 'saving' the children, was it not?  If that church had said First Baptist on the door, would you of demanded someone be held accountable then?  

We don't attack the Buddhist Temples and burn them down.  We don't attack the Jewish Synagogues and burn them down.  We don't attack the Muslims or Islamic's in this country, and we don't even attack the Church of Satan.  None of those churches even worship our God or believe in him which makes them enemies of our God according to our Bible, and they're free to do whatever they please in essence.  It is expressly a violation of our constitution to use the military against Citizens of these United States.

We've allowed our constitution to be violated and didn't hold the violators accountable because we think that the government will police itself.  I'm sorry, but we're many years down the road, overwhelming evidence has been presented that shows lie after lie by our government officials at Waco, and there's been a lot of talk, but what has been done?  The people responsible for the Waco 'holocaust' have not been tried and convicted of their crimes, and there were crimes committed, constitutional violations, and cold blooded murders committed as the FLIR Forward Looking Infrared Radar that was taken that day by the FBI clearly shows in the movie - Waco: The Rules of Engagement.

If Congress is incapable of doing what needs to be done or unwilling, then the responsibility falls back on the Dejure Citizens of our country to take action and see justice done.  Your fathers created the government, and as it says in the Preamble, you're the "Posterity" they created it for.  Now it's your responsibility to discuss what action needs to be taken and take it.  The government is not there to boss you around, it's there for you to tell it what YOU want done.  That was the plan originally.  You have a responsibility to do that.  Go read the Declaration Of Independence again and tell me I'm wrong.

Maybe you have forgotten the words of our fathers in the Declaration of Independence, but you have the same right to do what you wish with your government.  Abolish it if it needs abolishing, live with it if you can, replace it with another, or anything in-between.  If an elected judge has a right to sit in judgment of a citizen, since you were the creator of that branch of government he's operating in then certainly citizens as a group have not only the power to judge a citizens themselves, since YOU'RE DELEGATING THAT POWER TO HIM, but also the power to judge the judge if he gets out of line.  The only time you have less power than he has is when you have committed criminal acts.  If you're a Dejure Citizen, a member of the Posterity, then you not only have a right, but rather an obligation to hold your elected officials accountable for their actions.

Now think about that for a moment and just imagine a million of you guys heading up to DC to hold your own hearings in front of the Capitol where you're going to present evidence and hold trials and convict officials that committed crimes while in office, let's say, in relation to the Waco Holocaust for example.  These people haven't been tried yet, Congress isn't going to do it so you go up there and do it yourselves.  If you head up there unarmed, what's going to happen?  How far will you get?  If you build a gallows to hang these people on, how many do you think you can get on the end of that rope?

Would it work any better if you were armed?  Everybody from the President to the Pope would be calling it an outrage!  Either way, I can assure you that the government would call out every police force they have along with the military, their tanks if necessary, and whatever else they feel they need to protect themselves from the 'crazy Citizens' that think they have a right to hold them accountable for their actions without going through the 'proper' channels.  What are they afraid of?  Do they think that if we kick them out of their cushy little jobs and replace them with the most righteous men we have available, that somehow our way of life is going to come crumbling down?  Or do they just think that we'll uncover more than enough evidence to convict them of some crime worthy of hanging?  If they haven't committed any crimes against us, do they think we'll invent something because we're mad at them?  

It doesn't take much imagination to figure what's going to happen.  They're going to make criminals out of all of you.  Terrorists most likely.  That part about you being able to abolish your government, and replace it with another in the Declaration Of Independence isn't going to fly.  And they're going to sell that story to the public too, because the churchgoers in this country by and large don't remember what the Declaration of Independence says.  I can assure you they didn't STUDY the words in that document in any schools in this country in the last 100 years, must less even read them out loud.  We don't need to abolish it though, we need to enforce it.

You've probably never heard the pastor of your church even mention the name of one of your Christian Fathers that wrote the constitution that - you think - you're still living under today.  I'll bet money you never heard your pastor give a sermon about Noah Webster.  No mention about how he was a fine Christian man, and the things he did in his life that maybe we should try to emulate in some of ours or our children's.  No mention about his Christian values, and how they influenced generations of  other Christian men and women.  

Let's face it, your pastor teaches out of a history book that contains recorded history as far back as God saw fit to take it.  God didn't put a bunch of extra stuff in the Bible that we don't need to know or to read.  Doesn't it say in there somewhere that all scripture is profitable for knowledge and instruction?  Why then, do your preachers preach at best, only about 35% of the scriptures?  Here's a good example of 5 verses typically no Pastor will ever preach in an 'establishment' Church -

Drug, Druggist, Pharmacist, Medication, Pharmacy –

Sorcery, Witchcraft, Sorcerer

Gal 5:20  ...Idolatry, witchcraft, (Strong's Dictionary - 5331) hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,...  

Rev 18:23  And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (5331) were all nations deceived...  

5331  pharmakeia (far-mak-i'-ah); from 5332; medication ("pharmacy"), i.e. (by extension) magic (literally or figuratively):

KJV-- sorcery, witchcraft.

*************************************************************

Rev 9:21  Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, (Strong's Dictionary - 5332) nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts...  

Rev 21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, (5332) and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death...  

Rev 22:15  For without are dogs, and sorcerers, (5332) and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie...  

5332  pharmakeus (far-mak-yoos');

from pharmakon (a drug, i.e. spell-giving potion); a druggist ("pharmacist") or poisoner, i.e. (by extension) a magician:

KJV-- sorcerer.

*************************************************************

Strong's Dictionary - 5333  pharmakos (far-mak-os'); the same as 5332:

KJV-- sorcerer.

Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:

"pharmaceutical ... from Greek pharmakeutikos ... a medicinal drug."
"pharmaco- ... Greek pharmako-, from pharmakon ... medicine : drug."
"pharmacology ... the science of drugs."
"pharmacy ... from Greek pharmakeia ... the art or practice of preparing, preserving, compounding, and dispensing drugs ... a place where medicines are compounded or dispensed ... DRUGSTORE."

On the Web see -

http://www.htnpages.com/articles/sorcerers_medicine.htm

http://www.thehealthcrusader.com/pgs/archives/article_2003_02_21_2759.shtml

Webster's 1828 Dictionary - Pharmaceutic - PHARMACEU'TIC

PHARMACEU'TICAL, a. [Gr. to practice witchcraft or use medicine; poison or medicine.] Pertaining to the knowledge or art of pharmacy, or to the art of preparing medicines.

*************************************************************

Thayer's Greek Definitions:

G5332     fa?µa?e?´?     pharmakeus

1) one who prepares or uses magical remedies
2) sorcerer

A Related Word by Thayr's/Strong's Number: from pharmakon (a drug, i.e. spell-giving potion) and G5331     fa?µa?e?´a     pharmakeia

1) the use or the administering of drugs
2) poisoning
3) sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it
4) metaphorically the deceptions and seductions of idolatry.

Public Law 97-280 - Congress honors the Bible as Holy Scripture